Table 3.

Adjusted Logistic Regression Model of the Associations Between Total Alcohol Outlet Density and Male-to-Female and Female-to-Male Partner Violence

	MFPV	FMPV
	OR (95% CI)	OR (95% CI)
Total alcohol outlet density
10-unit increase	1.3 (1.1, 1.7)a	1.1 (0.8, 1.4)
Male
Age
10-year increase	0.6 (0.4, 0.9)a	0.8 (0.5, 1.2)
Education
<High school	1.5 (0.8, 2.7)	1.6 (0.8, 3.3)
=High school	Referent	Referent
>High school	0.9 (0.5, 1.5)	1.1 (0.8, 1.6)
Employment status
Employed	Referent	Referent
Retired	0.5 (0.1, 1.9)	0.9 (0.2, 4.0)
Unemployed/other	1.0 (0.5, 2.3)	1.5 (0.9, 2.6)
Has history of illicit drug use
No	Referent	Referent
Yes	1.4 (0.7, 2.7)	1.9 (0.9, 3.9)
Female
Age
10-year increase	0.9 (0.6, 1.5)	0.7 (0.4, 1.1)
Education
<High school	1.1 (0.5, 2.2)	0.9 (0.5, 1.7)
=High school	Referent	Referent
>High school	0.9 (0.5, 1.5)	0.7 (0.4, 1.3)
Employment status
Employed	Referenta	Referent
Homemaker	0.5 (0.3, 0.8)	0.9 (0.5, 1.6)
Unemployed	1.0 (0.5, 2.0)	0.8 (0.4, 1.5)
Retired/other	1.1 (0.2, 5.9)	0.9 (0.1, 5.5)
Has history of illicit drug use
No	Referenta	Referent
Yes	3.0 (1.0, 8.5)	1.7 (0.5, 5.7)
Couple level
Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic	Referent	Referenta
Black, non-Hispanic	1.7 (0.9, 3.0)	1.7 (0.9, 3.2)
Hispanic, any race	0.8 (0.5, 1.4)	0.6 (0.3, 1.1)
Mixed/other, non-Hispanic	1.3 (0.6, 2.8)	1.3 (0.8, 2.3)
Household income
<$10,000	Referent	Referent
$10 to 19,999	1.7 (0.8, 3.3)	1.4 (0.7, 2.6)
$20 to 29,999	0.9 (0.5, 1.9)	0.7 (0.4, 1.3)
$30 to 39,999	1.2 (0.5, 2.8)	0.6 (0.3, 1.3)
≥$40,000	1.0 (0.5, 2.1)	0.8 (0.4, 1.5)
Marital status
Married	Referent	Referent
Cohabitating	1.3 (0.7, 2.3)	1.2 (0.7, 2.2)
Neighborhood characteristics
Living in poverty
10% increase	1.3 (1.0, 1.6)a	1.2 (0.9, 1.7)
Living in owner occupied homes
10% increase	1.2 (1.0, 1.4)a	1.3 (1.1, 1.5)a
High school graduates
10% increase		1.0 (0.8, 1.3)
College graduates
10% increase		1.0 (0.8, 1.2)

^ap-value < 0.05.