Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Dis. 2008 Mar 10;30(3):303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.01.012

Table 1.

Autistic and control subjects.

CONTROL SAMPLES
Diagnosis ATP ID# SEX AGE PMI RIN % P 5′:3′ Cause of death
Control UMB1377 F 5 20.0 7.8 41.9% 1.98 Drowning
Control UMB1407 F 9 20.0 7.6 45.5% 1.59 Asthma
Control UMB1185 M 4 17.0 7.4 51.8% 1.41 Drowning
Control B4211 M 30 23.0 7.4 51.7% 1.07 Cardiac arrhythmia
Control B5873 M 28 23.0 7.6 49.3% 1.06 Unknown
Control B3829 M 22 24.0 7.1 53.6% 1.07 Central hepatic laceration
MEAN 16.3 21.2 7.5 49.0% 1.36
AUTISM SAMPLES
Diagnosis ATP ID# SEX AGE PMI RIN % P 5′:3′ Cause of death
Autism UMB4671 F 4 13.0 7.5 50.6% 1.00 Trauma
Autism UMB1174 F 7 14.0 8.0 45.0% 1.54 Sudden death, seizure
Autism UMB144 M 10 22.0 7.5 45.9% 1.58 Drawning
Autism B5173 M 30 20.0 7.2 50.4% 1.55 Gastrointestinal hemorrage
Autism B5000 M 27 8.3 7.2 54.0% 1.45 Drowning
Autism B5144 M 20 23.7 7.4 53.9% 1.04 Trauma
MEAN 16.3 16.8 7.5 50.0% 1.36

Autism Tissue Program identifier is depicted by ATP ID#. The age, postmortem interval (PMI), Bioanalyzer 2100 RNA integrity number (RIN), present call (%P) and Affymetrix 5′:3′ GAPDH ratio were not significantly different across the two groups (two-tailed t-test = 1.00, 0.17, 0.91, 0.65 and 0.99, respectively).