Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Genes Brain Behav. 2008 Nov 26;8(1):36–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-183X.2008.00441.x

TABLE 2.

Main Effects of COMT Val158Met Genotype on WAIS-R Subscale Scores

WAIS-R subscale < 13 years of education. N = 230 ≥ 13 years of education. N = 96
N Val/Val 123 Val/Met 94 Met/Met 14 F,(df) P value Val/Val 44 Val/Met 40 Met/Met 12 F, (df) P value
Inf 6.9 7.4 8.1 8.0 9.0 9.3 F = 5.9, (5)
(1.9) (1.8) (1.5) - (2.1) (2.0) (1.9) P = 0.004
*F = 11.6, (4)
*P = 0.001
Dsp 7.7 7.8 8.9 9.1 9.8 8.2 F = 2.5 (3)
(2.3) (2.5) (2.2) - (2.2) (2.4) (2.9) P = 0.083
PC 8.3 9.4 9.3 F = 4.7, (3) 9.3 9.5 10.6
(2.1) (2.2) (1.9) P = 0.010 (2.3) (2.4) (3.0) -
*F = 9.4 (2)
*P = 0.003
BD 10.0 9.4 10.0 F = 2.3 (6) 10.6 11.4 11.2
(3.0) (2.3) (2.4) P = 0.10 (3.1) (3.0) (3.4) -

ANOVA P values ≤ 0.10 are given here.

F and p values are for COMT genotype effects

Inf = Information; Dsp = Digit Span; Ar = Arithmetic; PC = Picture Completion; BD = Block Design. Digit Symbol, Similarities and Arithmetic were not included since there were no significant or even trend effects.

*

Results are for COMT Val/Val vs [Val/Met + Met/Met]