. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2008 Nov 26;116(1-2):30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.10.022

Table 3.

Contribution of IMT and SKIP performance to course of illness: probit analysis

	Suicide at tempt		Alcohol/substance abuse		Many episodes		Axis II cluster B
	Wald	p	Wald	p	Wald	p	Wald	p
IMT
CD	0.2	0.6	5.81	0.02	1.61	0.2	10.4	0.001
CE	1.12	0.3	1.13	0.3	0.2	0.6	1.96	0.16
CD RT	6.76	0.009	8.37	0.004	1.34	0.25	0.28	0.6
CE RT	6.52	0.01	9.27	0.002	6.9	0.009	1.91	0.17
SKIP^a
Total responses	1.14	0.3	4.07	0.04	5.56	0.02	1.24	0.26
Shortest delay	1.37	0.24	2.46	0.12	1.03	0.3	6.46	0.01
Longest delay	0.5	0.4	1.37	0.24	2.07	0.15	0.22	0.64
Demographics
Age	0.03	0.8	0.12	3.36	0.1	0.8	0.6	0.4
Education	0.2	0.7	4	0.04	0.6	0.5	0.01	0.9

The table shows Wald statistics and their significances. CD = correct detections, CE = commission errors, CD RT is reaction time to a correct detection, and CE RT is reaction time to a commission error.

All SKIP measures were log transformed. Significant relationships are shown in bold face.