Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Gastroenterology. 2009 Mar 6;136(7):2101–2114.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.062

Table 2.

Base-Case Analysis

Strategy Cost dQALYs Cost-Effectiveness* ICER Cancers per 100 population
HGD No surveillance $1,859 12.43 $150 37.3
RFA with surveillance $20,776 15.67 $1,326 $5,839 4.0
APC ablation with surveillance $22,117 15.62 $1,416 (Dominated) 4.1
PDT ablation with surveillance $34,580 15.67 $2,207 $32,588,150 4.3
Surveillance $48,354 14.82 $3,263 (Dominated) 7.9
Esophagectomy $58,973 15.02 $3,926 (Dominated) 1.8
LGD No surveillance $687 14.71 $47 14.7
Ablation without surveillance+ $12,540 15.78 $795 $11,147 4.5
APC ablation with surveillance $13,881 15.73 $882 (Dominated) 4.8
RFA with surveillance $14,409 15.78 $913 (Dominated) 4.4
Surveillance $16,210 15.38 $1,054 (Dominated) 10.4
PDT ablation with surveillance $28,017 15.75 $1,779 (Dominated) 4.9
No Dysplasia No surveillance $471 15.19 $31 11.0
Ablation without surveillance+ $10,876 15.83 $687 $16,286 3.2
Surveillance with RFA for incident dysplasia $10,933 15.67 $698 (Dominated) 5.8
APC ablation with surveillance $12,512 15.77 $794 (Dominated) 4.3
MPEC ablation with surveillance $12,691 15.81 $803 (Dominated) 3.6
RFA with surveillance $13,268 15.83 $838 (Dominated) 3.1

dQALYs: discounted quality-adjusted life-years; ICER: incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; HGD: high-grade dysplasia; LGD: low-grade dysplasia; APC: argon plasma coagulation; RFA: radiofrequency ablation; PDT: photodynamic therapy; MPEC: multipolar electrocoagulation

Ablation without surveillance refers to a strategy in which surveillance is not performed for patients in whom complete ablation of metaplasia has been achieved.

*

Compared to a common baseline

+

Ablation modeled using RFA parameter estimates