Skip to main content
editorial
. 2008 Mar 7;14(9):1313–1317. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1313

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Proportion of a “good scoring” in small bowel visualization with (B) and without (A) preparation, a meta-analysis of 5 papers and 237 patients. Data were sufficiently homogenous, and statistically significant difference that favored preparation for good visualization is demonstrated. The statistical significance of results did not differ between fixed and random mode.