Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 8.
Published in final edited form as: Oncology (Williston Park). 2006 Aug;20(9):1029–1048.

Table 3.

Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk With Aromatase Inhibitors and Tamoxifen

Trial Endpoint AI vs Comparator P Value
Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen
ATAC[26-28] Lumbar spine BMD, 24 mo Fracture, 40 mo Fracture, 60 mo −4.0% 1.9% .003
7.1% 4.4% <.0001
11.0% 7.7% <.05
Letrozole vs Placebo
MA17[2931] Total hip BMD, 24 mo Osteoporosis, 30 mo −3.6% −0.71% .044
8.0% 6.0% .003
Letrozole vs Tamoxifen
BIG1-98[32] Fracture, 24 mo 5.7% 4.0% .0006
Anastrozole vs Tamoxifen
ABCSG-8/ARNO-95[33] Fracture, 28 mo 2.4% 1.2% .015
Anastrozole vs Tamoxifena
ABCSG-12[[33] Lumbar spine BMD, 36 mo −17.4% 11.6% <.0001
Exemestane vs Tamoxifen
IES[34,35] Lumbar spine BMD, 12 mo Total hip BMD, 12 mo Fracture, 31 mo −3.17% −.19% <.0001
−2.15% −.58% .001
3.1% 2.3% .05
Exemestane vs Placebo
Lonning et al [36,37] Femoral neck BMD, 24 mob −2.72% −1.48% .023
a

Both plus the GnRH agonist goserelin.

b

Annual rate calculated after 2 years.

AI = aromatase inhibitor; BMD = bone mineral density.