Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov;45(4):829–849. doi: 10.1353/dem.0.0028

Table 6.

Effect of Spouse’s Occupational Mobility on Own Earnings

Couple Type β2 Estimate
Full Sample No Child Younger Than 18 Child Younger Than 18
Power Couple
  Husband 0.029 (0.076) −0.031 (0.082) 0.078 (0.088)
  Wife −1.01*** (0.176) −0.594*** (0.110) −1.26*** (0.219)
  N 153,362 58,293 95,069
Husband Only College
  Husband −0.044 (0.201) 0.246 (0.178) −0.209 (0.250)
  Wife −1.01*** (0.220) −0.748*** (0.146) −1.15*** (0.284)
  N 77,874 31,096 46,778
Wife Only College
  Husband −0.042 (0.077) −0.058 (0.127) −0.012 (0.076)
  Wife −0.152 (0.210) −0.079 (0.154) −0.246 (0.272)
  N 80,901 30,088 50,813
Neither College
  Husband −0.669*** (0.152) −0.583*** (0.157) −0.701*** (0.153)
  Wife −0.117 (0.175) 0.045 (0.176) −0.225 (0.192)
  N 374,284 139,700 234,584

Notes: The sample is as described in Table 1, excluding couples in which either partner is without earnings in 1999. Dependent variable is the logarithm of own earnings in 1999. The table reports estimates of β2 from Eq. (3), which is the coefficient on the migration rate in the spouse’s occupation-education group. Measurement of explanatory variables and couple groupings are described in the notes of Tables 1 and 3. Regressions include the same controls listed in the notes of Table 4, with the addition of occupation fixed-effects. Standard errors, shown in parentheses, are clustered by spouse’s occupation-education group.

***

p < .001