Skip to main content
. 2009 May 11;10:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-140

Table 4.

The computed results of the flux connectivity constraints for Case II

Without flux connectivity constraints With flux connectivity constraints
No. noise-free 5% noise noise-free 5% noise

1 4.735E-1 5.392E-1 5.499E-5 3.573E-3
2 -1.742 -1.785 -3.055E-5 -8.999E-4
3 1.231E-1 1.375E-1 6.428E-5 -2.474E-4
4 1.720 1.745 -2.078E-6 1.351E-3
5 -4.973E-1 -5.237E-1 1.404E-5 -1.694E-3
6 5.514E-1 4.366E-1 1.852E-4 -2.283E-3
7 -1.394 -1.336 -4.564E-5 6.405E-4
8 5.378E-1 5.177E-1 -2.719E-5 1.319E-4
9 1.241 1.209 1.303E-4 -8.199E-4
10 -3.540E-1 -3.401E-1 -1.360E-4 1.042E-3
11 3.681E-1 3.208E-1 -1.211E-4 -1.929E-3
12 -2.213 -2.267 -9.843E-6 3.888E-4
13 -4.378E-1 -4.162E-1 1.878E-4 -6.744E-5
14 2.367 2.411 -1.812E-4 -4.822E-4
15 -6.911E-1 -6.132E-1 2.170E-4 5.719E-4

"Noise-free" indicates that the measured flux control coefficients are perfect, while "5% noise" is based on measured flux control coefficients with 5% uncertainty.