Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 18;4(6):e5964. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005964

Table 2. Leaf litter quality and root biomass of tree species (mean±SE) and F and P values from ANOVA.

Litter N (%) Litter C (%) Litter C∶N Litter cellulose (%) Litter lignin (%) Litter lignin∶N Fine root biomass (g m−2)* Coarse root biomass (g m−2)*
Aspen 0.84±0.08a 49.4±0.4a 60.4±5.2a 42.1±3.0a 20.2±2.2a 24.1±1.2a 321±47 422±134
Pine 0.47±0.03b 52.0±0.3b 112.1±8.3b 59.0±1.0b 33.8±0.5b 73.2±5.7b 215±25 232±87
Spruce 0.41±0.01b 48.7±0.1a 118.3±4.2b 41.1±1.1a 19.2±0.7a 46.6±1.7c 249±28 319±62
Species F2, 11 = 19.0 F2, 11 = 24.1 F2, 11 = 23.9 F2, 11 = 20.7 F2, 11 = 33.9 F2, 11 = 36.9 F2, 35 = 1.8 F2, 35 = 2.1
P = 0.003 P<0.001 P = 0.001 P = 0.002 P<0.001 P<0.001 P = 0.204 P = 0.169
Block F3, 11 = 0.7 F3, 11 = 0.9 F3, 11 = 0.7 F3, 11 = 0.3 F3, 11 = 0.8 F3, 11 = 0.3 F3, 35 = 0.2 F3, 35 = 0.8
P = 0.585 P = 0.381 P = 0.587 P = 0.845 P = 0.532 P = 0.847 P = 0.900 P = 0.539
S×B NA§ NA NA NA NA NA F6, 35 = 1.8 F6, 35 = 1.8
P = 0.172 P = 0.184
*

Fine roots were<1 mm diameter; coarse roots were >1 mm diameter.

§

Not applicable since there was only one litter sample per stand.

Different letters denote significant differences among tree species (P = 0.05).