Table 4.
A quality scoring system for cohort studies
First author | P (2), R (1) | Was exposure assessment the same for all participants? | Was outcome assessment the same for all participants? | Were outcome assessors blind to exposure status? | Were the number of and reasons for study withdrawals reported? |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Yes (2), Partial (1), No (0) | Yes (2), Partial (1), No (0) | Yes (2), Partial (1), No (0) | Yes (2), Partial (1), No (0) | ||
Lau 2001 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Kessler 1999 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Wilkinson 2004 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Garcia-Aymerich 2003 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Groenwegn 2003 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
Soler 2005 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Wang 2005 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Gudmundsson 2005 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Connolly 2006 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
R = retrospective, P = prospective