Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 11.
Published in final edited form as: J Biol Chem. 2007 Aug 22;282(43):31744–31754. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703378200

TABLE 1. Comparison of kinetic constants for EAH and HPO hydroxylases.

Constants were calculated by nonlinear regression fits to the Michaelis-Menten equation.

Enzyme Substrate Product Km kcat kcat/Km
µm S−1
EAHa EA Capsidiol 19.2 ± 2.9 0.5 ± 0.04 0.03
1β-(OH)EA Capsidiol 1.7 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.01 0.35

HPO PSD Solavetivol 14.0 ± 1.9 2.1 ± 0.10 0.15
PSD Solavetivone 1.7 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.01 0.06
Solavetivol Solavetivone 1.2 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.01 0.08
Valencene α-Nootkatol 11.5 ± 1.9 0.1 ± 0.01 0.01
Valencene β-Nootkatol 7.4 ± 1.2 1.9 ± 0.07 0.26
EA 2β-(OH)EA 3.3 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.01 0.06
EE 2β-(OH)EE 7.8 ± 1.0 0.8 ± 0.03 0.10
Cedr-8-ene Cedr-8-en-15-ol 26.5 ± 1.1 0.1 ± 0.01 0.00
a

EAH kinetic data are from Takahashi et al. (15); EA, 5-epi-aristolochene; PSD, premnaspirodiene; EE, epi-eremophilene.