Table 3.
AMI | HF | PN | THR/TKR | CABG║ | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top‡ | Bottom§ | Top‡ | Bottom§ | Top‡ | Bottom§ | Top‡ | Bottom§ | Top‡ | Bottom§ | |
Order sets | 93.3 | 89.7 | 88.9 | 76.9 | 93.3 | 84.6 | 91.1† | 64.1† | 93.5 | 87.5 |
Clinical pathways | 48.9† | 15.4† | 44.4† | 17.9† | 37.8† | 12.8† | 55.6† | 23.1† | 45.2 | 31.3 |
Educational sessions, physicians | 77.8 | 71.8 | 75.6 | 71.8 | 71.1 | 69.2 | 62.2 | 53.8 | 67.7 | 68.8 |
Educational sessions, nurses | 86.7 | 76.9 | 86.7 | 74.4 | 82.2 | 76.9 | 71.1 | 79.3 | 74.2 | 68.8 |
Multidisciplinary team | 93.3* | 76.9* | 93.3† | 69.2† | 86.7 | 74.4 | 84.4 | 66.7 | 96.8 | 81.3 |
Χ2 (or Fisher-exact) testing between top and bottom performing hospitals for each quality improvement intervention in each clinical condition was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), unless marked otherwise: *p < 0.05; †p < 0.01
‡Top performing: n = 45 for AMI, HF, PN, THR/TKR & n = 31 for CABG
§Bottom performing: n = 39 for AMI, HF, PN, THR/TKR & n = 16 for CABG
║Asked only of respondents of hospitals that performed CABG