Skip to main content
. 2009 May 5;24(7):833–840. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0997-6

Table 3.

Percentage Reporting Utilization of Quality Improvement Interventions by Condition

  AMI HF PN THR/TKR CABG
Top Bottom§ Top Bottom§ Top Bottom§ Top Bottom§ Top Bottom§
Order sets 93.3 89.7 88.9 76.9 93.3 84.6 91.1 64.1 93.5 87.5
Clinical pathways 48.9 15.4 44.4 17.9 37.8 12.8 55.6 23.1 45.2 31.3
Educational sessions, physicians 77.8 71.8 75.6 71.8 71.1 69.2 62.2 53.8 67.7 68.8
Educational sessions, nurses 86.7 76.9 86.7 74.4 82.2 76.9 71.1 79.3 74.2 68.8
Multidisciplinary team 93.3* 76.9* 93.3 69.2 86.7 74.4 84.4 66.7 96.8 81.3

Χ2 (or Fisher-exact) testing between top and bottom performing hospitals for each quality improvement intervention in each clinical condition was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), unless marked otherwise: *p < 0.05; p < 0.01

Top performing: n = 45 for AMI, HF, PN, THR/TKR & n = 31 for CABG

§Bottom performing: n = 39 for AMI, HF, PN, THR/TKR & n = 16 for CABG

Asked only of respondents of hospitals that performed CABG