TABLE 3.
Strength of synchronous firing in different cell types
| Property | YA–YC | YC–YC | YA–YA | XA–XA | XA–YA | XA–YC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A. All cell pairs | ||||||
| Synchrony strength | ||||||
| ≥20% RF overlap | 8.0 ± 4.7% (15) | 9.8 ± 5.9% (17) | 13.4 ± 10.7% (4) | 10.0 ± 10.0% (20) | 7.7 ± 1.9% (6) | 12.0 ± 14.7% (2) |
| ≥40% RF overlap | 8.0 ± 4.7% (15) | 9.8 ± 5.9% (17) | 13.4 ± 10.7% (4) | 10.0 ± 10.0% (20) | 7.7 ± 1.9% (6) | 12.0 ± 14.7% (2) |
| ≥80% RF overlap | 8.1 ± 4.7% (13) | 10.0 ± 4.5% (7) | 22.2 ± 5.8% (2) | 12.0 ± 11.3% (14) | 10.0 ± 0.1% (2) | 12.0 ± 14.7% (2) |
| B. Average and maximum strength | ||||||
| Average synchrony strength | 8.0 ± 4.7% (15) | 9.8 ± 5.9% (17) | 13.4 ± 10.7% (4) | 10.0 ± 10.0% (20) | 7.7 ± 1.9% (6) | 12.0 ± 14.7% (2) |
| Maximum synchrony strength | 17.7% | 24.1% | 26.3% | 46.9% | 10.1% | 22.5% |
The numbers in parentheses represent the sample sizes. All tightly correlated cell pairs had receptive fields of the same sign except one XA–XA cell pair.