Skip to main content
. 2009 May 12;100(11):1704–1719. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605061

Table 7. Randomised studies evaluating combination vs sequential treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

Study Treatment arms Number of patients First line response rates P-value Median progression-free survival from first line treatment (months) P-value Median overall survival (months) P-value
Seymour et al (2007a, 2007b) FOCUS Strategy A 5-FU/LV → irinotecan 710 28% (5-FU/LV)   6.3 (5-FU/LV)   13.9  
  Strategy B 5-FU/LV → FOLFIRI or FOLFOX 356 (FOLFIRI) 356 (FOLFOX) 28% (5-FU/LV) <0.001 (strategy C vs A or B) 6.3 (5-FU/LV) <0.001 (strategy C vs A or B) 15.1 NS
  Strategy C FOLFIRI → FOLFOX FOLFOX → FOLFIRI 356 (FOLFIRI) 357 (FOLFOX) 49% (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI)   8.5 (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI)   15.9  
Koopman et al (2007) CAIRO Strategy A capecitabine → irinotecan → CAPOX 410 20% (capecitabine) <0.0001 5.8 (capecitabine) 0.0002 16.3 0.3281
  Strategy B CAPIRI → CAPOX 410 41% (CAPIRI or CAPOX)   7.8 (CAPIRI or CAPOX)   17.4  
Cunningham et al (2009) LIFE Strategy A 5-FU/LV → irinotecan 363 29.8% (5-FU/LV) <0.0001 5.9 (5-FU/LV) <0.0001 15.2 0.155
  Strategy B FOLFOX → irintoecan 362 54.1% (FOLFOX)   7.9 (FOLFOX)   15.9  

LV=leucovorin, FOLFOX=oxaliplatin/infused 5-FU/LV, FOLFIRI=irinotecan/infused 5-FU/LV, CAPOX=capecitabine/oxaliplatin, CAPIRI=capecitabine/irinotecan, NR=not reported, NS=non significant.