Skip to main content
. 2008 Oct 29;46(2):457–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01576.x

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Prevalence, deer density (deer mi−2), and antlerless harvest‐rate for a deer population managed via fixed and density‐dependent harvest (maximum harvest rate equals 48% and 26% for antlered and antlerless deer, respectively) under density‐ and frequency‐dependent transmission models. Note different time‐scales for density‐ and frequency‐dependent transmission models.