Table 2.
Author | Treatment | No. of patients/No. of lesions | Results1 (contrast agent) |
Bartolozzi et al[102] | PEI | 40/47 | Sensitivity 92% |
Specificity 100% | |||
Accuracy 98% | |||
(Levovist) | |||
Wen et al[103] | RFA | 67/91 | Sensitivity 95.30% |
Specificity 100% | |||
Accuracy 98.10% | |||
(Levovist) | |||
Meloni et al[104] | RFA | 25/43 | Sensitivity 83.30% |
Specificity 100% | |||
(Levovist) | |||
Choi et al[105] | RFA | 40/45 | Diagnostic agreement 100% |
(Levovist) | |||
Kim et al[106] | RFA | 90/94 | Diagnostic concordace2 99% |
(Levovist) | |||
Solbiati et al[107] | RFA | 20/203 | Sensitivity 50% |
Specificity 100% | |||
Diagnostic agreement 85% | |||
(Levovist) | |||
Pompili et al[110] | PEI, RFA, TACE | 47/56 | Sensitivity 87% |
Combined treatments | Specificity 98.40% | ||
Diagnostic agreement 94.60% | |||
(SonoVue) |
Comparison with contrast-enhanced helical CT;
1-mo follow-up CT;
Solitary colorectal liver metastases.