Skip to main content
. 2008 Mar 21;14(11):1710–1719. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.1710

Table 2.

Assessment of therapeutic response after percutaneous treatment for HCC using contrast-enhanced US

Author Treatment No. of patients/No. of lesions Results1 (contrast agent)
Bartolozzi et al[102] PEI 40/47 Sensitivity 92%
Specificity 100%
Accuracy 98%
(Levovist)
Wen et al[103] RFA 67/91 Sensitivity 95.30%
Specificity 100%
Accuracy 98.10%
(Levovist)
Meloni et al[104] RFA 25/43 Sensitivity 83.30%
Specificity 100%
(Levovist)
Choi et al[105] RFA 40/45 Diagnostic agreement 100%
(Levovist)
Kim et al[106] RFA 90/94 Diagnostic concordace2 99%
(Levovist)
Solbiati et al[107] RFA 20/203 Sensitivity 50%
Specificity 100%
Diagnostic agreement 85%
(Levovist)
Pompili et al[110] PEI, RFA, TACE 47/56 Sensitivity 87%
Combined treatments Specificity 98.40%
Diagnostic agreement 94.60%
(SonoVue)
1

Comparison with contrast-enhanced helical CT;

2

1-mo follow-up CT;

3

Solitary colorectal liver metastases.