Skip to main content
. 2008 Feb 21;35(4):766–774. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn004

Table 1.

Cross-trait, Within-Relative Analysis of the Separate Associations Between the Different Dimensions of the Subclinical Psychosis Phenotype at T2 and Subjective Cognitive Failures at T1

Subclinical Psychosis Dimension B (SE) 95% CI P Standardized β
Frequencya
    CAPE positive dimension −0.058 (0.507) −1.056, 0.940 .909 −.005
    CAPE negative dimension 3.542 (0.624) 2.313, 4.771 .000 .312
    CAPE depressive dimension 3.494 (0.632) 2.250, 4.739 .000 .308
    SIS-R positive schizotypy −0.017 (0.296) −0.599, 0.566 .955 −.003
    SIS-R negative schizotypy 1.536 (0.275) 0.996, 2.077 .000 .373
    SIS-R disorganization −1.524 (1.160) −3.809, 0.760 .190 −.070
Distressb
    CAPE positive dimension 0.453 (0.584) −0.697, 1.604 .438 .0409
    CAPE negative dimension 2.334 (0.822) 0.716, 3.953 .005 .2088
    CAPE depressive dimension −0.593 (0.718) −2.008, 0.821 .410 −.0536

Notes: All associations adjusted for sex, age, education, drug use and the other subclinical psychosis dimensions. CI, confidence interval; CAPE, Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences; SIS-R, Structured Interview for Schizotypy—Revised.

a

Adjusted for the frequency score of the other remaining subclinical dimensions.

b

Adjusted for the distress score of the other remaining subclinical psychosis dimensions and for the corresponding frequency score.