Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2009 Jan 21;33(4):740–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2008.00891.x

Table 2.

General performance in the stop signal task

group Median go RT (ms) %go %stop SSRT (ms) FP effect^ (effect size) PES (effect size) RT difference between pG speeding and slowing (ms)^
PAD 687 ± 114 96.2 ± 1.63 53.3 ± 3.6 190 ± 30 1.78 ± 1.68 1.56 ± 2.06 −171 ± 33
HC 595 ± 150 96.5 ± 1.81 50.9 ± 2.6 195 ± 36 2.27 ± 1.65 1.42 ± 1.52 −181 ± 49
P value 0.020* 0.850 0.010* 0.645 0.310 0.791 0.386

Note: PAD: patients with alcohol dependence; HC: healthy controls; %go and %stop: percentage of successful go and stop trials; SSRT: stop-signal reaction time; FP (fore-period) effect: 42 ± 42 ms (AD) vs. 54 ± 34 ms (HC); PES (post-error slowing): 38 ± 51 ms (AD) vs. 36 ± 37 ms (HC); all numbers are mean ± standard deviation. P value based on 2-talied two sample t test.

*

<0.05

^

pG: post-go; =extent of post-go speeding – extent of post-go slowing. See text for further explanation.