Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jun 9;15(12):4165–4173. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0119

Table 5.

Sub-analysis of the association of Val16Ala with 10-year breast cancer survival by specific chemotherapy regimen

Therapy* Univariate Multivariate$
HR (95% CI) P-value n HR (95% CI) P-value n
Doxorubicin monotherapy (n=86)
Val/Val 1 (ref.) 22 1 (ref.) 22
Val/Ala 0.65 (0.30–1.45) 0.300 43 0.70 (0.31–1.61) 0.402 43
Ala/Ala 1.73 (0.77–3.87) 0.180 21 2.03 (0.84–4.87) 0.115 21
Val/Ala & Ala/Ala 0.95 (0.47–1.92) 0.893 64 1.05(0.50–2.20) 0.892 64
Ptrend 0.189
Val/Val & Val/Ala 1 (ref.) 65 1 (ref.) 65
Ala/Ala 2.18 1.12–4.22) 0.020 21 2.35 (1.18–4.66) 0.015 21
Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin or Cyclophosphamide/Doxorubicin/5-FU (n=63)
Val/Val 1 (ref.) 21 1 (ref.) 18
Val/Ala 2.61 (0.71–9.51) 0.145 32 2.49 (0.39–15.8) 0.330 28
Ala/Ala 6.33 (1.58–25.7) 0.010 10 139.5 (2.77–7017) 0.013 8
Val/Ala & Ala/Ala 3.37 (0.98–11.59) 0.054 42 2.60 (0.54–12.5) 0.233 36
Ptrend 0.005
Val/Val & Val/Ala 1 (ref.) 53 1 (ref.) 46
Ala/Ala 3.51 (1.32–9.33) 0.012 10 16.1 (3.22–80.3) 0.001 8
Mitomycin/5-FU (n=35)
Val/Val 1 (ref.) 8 1 (ref.) 8
Val/Ala 2.44 (0.52–11.4) 0.256 19 2.80 (0.54–14.4) 0.218 19
Ala/Ala 1.62 (0.27–9.75) 0.598 8 1.91 (0.26–13.9) 0.521 8
Val/Ala & Ala/Ala 2.20 (0.49–9.85) 0.305 27 2.20 (0.47–10.3) 0.316 27
Ptrend 0.797
Val/Val & Val/Ala 1 (ref.) 27 1 (ref.) 27
Ala/Ala 0.79 (0.22–2.85) 0.721 8 0.57 (0.14–2.26) 0.428 8
Cyclophosphamide/Methotrexate/5-FU (n=77)
Val/Val 1 (ref.) 14 1 (ref.) 14
Val/Ala 3.05 (0.69–13.4) 0.141 41 2.15 (0.45–10.3) 0.338 36
Ala/Ala 6.02 (1.35–26.8) 0.018 22 24.27 (2.84–207) 0.004 19
Val/Ala & Ala/Ala 3.99 (0.95–16.8) 0.059 63 4.61 (1.06–20.1) 0.042 55
Ptrend 0.004
Val/Val & Val/Ala 1 (ref.) 55 1 (ref.) 50
Ala/Ala 2.53 (1.21–5.26) 0.013 22 4.17 (1.77–9.81) 0.001 19
*

11 patients who received doxorubicin and 3 patients who received cyclophosphamide as part of other therapy regimens than described were not included in the analyses

$

Cox Proportional-Hazards regression with adjustments for age at diagnosis, study site, race, tumor size, tumor grade, nodal involvement, p53 mutation and estrogen receptor status