. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 16.

Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2008 Dec;22(6):843–854. doi: 10.1037/a0013809

Table 3.

Fit Statistics and Comparisons for Structural Models

	df	χ ²	χ²/df	AGFI	CFI	RMSEA	AIC
1. Parallel Mediators	26	49.538	1.91	.86	.96	.078	129.54
2. Triangulation Driven	31	62.060	2.00	.86	.95	.083	132.06
3. Distress Final Common Path	33	90.140	2.73	.81	.90	.109	156.14
4. Reverse Flow Parallel Mediators	26	61.934	2.38	.83	.94	.097	141.93

Comparisons of Fit Between Models
	df	χ ²	p	Preferred Model
Parallel vs. Triangulation	5	12.522	< .05	Parallel Mediators
Parallel vs. Distress	7	40.602	< .001	Parallel Mediators
Distress vs. Triangulation	2	28.080	< .001	Triangulation Driven