Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Nerv Ment Dis. 2009 Jun;197(6):383–390. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181a653b7

Table 1.

Descriptive Statistics for Continuous Study Variables

Outcome and Control Variables Mean (SD) Range
Dissociative Experiences Scale 16.29 (11.71) 1 – 62
Demographic Risk 2.05 (.94) 0 – 5

Quality of Early Care Variables
HOMIRS: Positive affective involvement .06 (.94) −2.18 – 1.75
HOMIRS: Hostile-intrusiveness .01 (1.01) −1.35 – 2.79
HOMIRS: Routine care .08 (.99) −1.73 – 3.82
HOMIRS: Flatness of affect −.11 (.82) −1.28 – 2.70
AMBIANCE: Disrupted Communication 4.24 (1.73) 1 – 7
Infant Disorganization Scale 3.50 (1.25) 1 – 5a

Childhood Trauma Variables
CTS-2 9.27 (10.38) 0 – 50
CTES-R Total abuse 8.77 (3.38) 4 – 20
 CTES-R Physical abuse 2.33 (1.19) 1 – 5
 CTES-R Sexual abuse 1.40 (1.11) 1 – 5
 CTES-R Witnessed violence 2.15 (1.29) 1 – 5
 CTES-R Verbal abuse 2.19 (1.34) 1 – 5

Note. HOMIRS = Home Observation of Maternal Interaction Rating Scales: AMBIANCE = Atypical Maternal Behavior Instrument for Assessment and Classification; CTS-2 = Conflict Tactics Scale - 2nd Edition; CTES-R = Childhood Traumatic Experiences Scale - Revised.

a

The earliest version of the Infant Disorganization Scale was a five-point scale, with four additional half-points, yielding nine scale points as used here. Scores of 4, 4.5, and 5 corresponded to a classification of disorganized.