Skip to main content
. 2009 Mar;11(2):96–102. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00041.x

Table 3.

Laparoscopic necrosectomy

Study n Delay to necrosectomy, days, median (range) Pre-op infected necrosis Technique Post-op irrigation Procedures per patient, n Major complications, % Laparotomy required, n Intensive care unit stay, days Inpatient stay, days Mortality
Bucher et al. 200826 8 31 (13–59) 8 Single-port 5-mm scope 8 1 (2) 0 0 0 (0–4) N/A 0
Parekh 200627a 19 65 (22–154) N/A 3 ports and hand-assist N/A 1 median (1–3) 1 3 6 ± 2 16 ± 4 2
Ammori 200228 1 36 1 5 ports all lap 1 1 0 0 0 14 0
Horvath et al. 200129 6 30 (27–77) 6 2 ports, retroperitoneal No pneumo 3 N/A N/A 2 N/A N/A 0
Zhu et al. 200030 10 1–3 N/A 3 ports pneumo 3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 1
Alverdy et al. 200031 2 20 (18–21) 1 2-ports Seldinger 5-mm scope 0 2 (1–3) 1 0 0 N/A 0
a

Parekh (2006) describes a series of 19 from a total of 23 patients undergoing necrosectomy during 2001–2006. One conversion was for intraoperative enteric injury

N/A, data not available; lap, laparoscopic; pneumo, pneumoperitoneum