Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 25;4(6):e6035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006035

Table 2. Stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate of leaves of Arabidopsis plants grown at elevated or ambient CO2 in different generations.

Photosynthetic features Stomatal conductance (mmol m−2 s−1) decrease Transpiration rate (mmol m−2 s−1) decrease Photosynthetic rate (µmol m−2 s−1) increase
Treatment AC EC AC EC AC EC
Generation 1 385.6±23.2a 220.4±14.0b 42.8% 8.16±0.41a 5.18±0.24b 36.5% 14.1±1.2a 16.3±1.4b 15.6%
8 410.4±25.5a 239.4±15.6b 41.7% 8.32±0.40a 5.46±0.25b 34.4% 14.8±1.5a 17.2±1.3b 16.2%
15 377.8±21.6a 221.6±13.9b 41.3% 7.79±0.39a 5.15±0.21b 33.9% 13.5±1.4a 15.8±1.5b 17.0%
SA* 382.0±20.4a 227.8±13.3b 40.4% 7.91±0.45a 5.34±0.28b 32.5% 13.9±1.4a 16.6±1.3 19.4%
SE* 406.2±22.5a 230.4±16.1b 43.3% 8.05±0.36a 5.38±0.31b 33.2% 14.4±1.6a 16.9±1.7b 17.4%
P-value 0.061–0.801 0.078–0.895 / 0.067–0.650 0.067–0.838 / 0.204–0.813 0.162–0.808 /
Average 392.4 227.9 41.9% 8.05 5.30 34.1% 14.1 16.6 17.1%

The values given indicate means±SD from five plants. Three fully expanded rosette leaves at stage 5.0 were sampled from each of five plants were analyzed for stomatal conductance, transpiration rate and photosynthetic rate. Mean values were compared by t-test.

*

The seeds used in the reciprocal sowing experiments were from the fifteenth generation grown in ambient CO2 (SA) and elevated CO2 (SE).

Abbreviations: AC: Ambient CO2; EC: Elevated CO2.