Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Mar;2(3):224–230. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.09.014

Table 1.

A comparison of antegrade XFM with conventional retrograde X-ray guided transcatheter VSD repair (see text). XFM: X-ray Fused with MRI; VSD: Ventricular Septal Defect

Antegrade XFM Conventional Retrograde X-ray
VSD crossing (seconds) 167 ± 103 284 ± 61 p = 0.025
Sheath positioning (seconds) 71 ± 32 366 ± 145 p = 0.001
Total fluoroscopy (seconds) 158 ± 95 390 ± 137s p = 0.003
Radiation dose-area product
(DAP, mG•m2)
2394 ± 1522 4865 ± 1759 p = 0.016