TABLE 2.
Modelb | IFN-α concn (U/ml) | R(0) (106 copies/μg RNA) | t0 (h) | ɛin | μ (per day) | g (per day) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eq. 2 | 100 | 2.06 (1.81-2.35) | 9.5 (5.1-13.8) | 0.972 (0.966-0.988) | 0.98 (0.88-1.07) | NAc |
Eq. 4 | 100 | 2.06 (1.81-2.35) | 9.5 (5.1-13.8) | 0.972 (0.966-0.978) | 0.027 (0.02-0.04) | NA |
Eq. 6 | 100 | 2.06 (1.81-2.35) | 9.5 (3.6-15.4) | 0.972 (0.966-0.978) | 0.98 (0.85-1.11) | 3 × 10−8 (0-0.001)d |
Eq. 6 | 250 | 2.29 (1.74-3.03) | 7.8 (3.1-12.4) | 0.927 (0.883-0.970) | 2.32 (1.57-3.07) | 0.33 (0.217-0.448) |
Best fits to the frequent sg1b data with 100 and 250 U/ml IFN-α are shown in Fig. 3C. Values in parentheses are 95% CIs. R(0), baseline sg1b RNA concentration; t0, delay until sg1b RNA starts to decline; ɛin, IFN-α effectiveness in blocking sg1b RNA production; μ, sg1b RNA degradation; g, slowing of sg1b RNA production.
Eq, equation.
The lower 95% CI (g = 0) is consistent with a flat second phase.