Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 15;83(13):6383–6390. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02612-08

TABLE 2.

Parameter estimates obtained by fitting models to the dataa

Modelb IFN-α concn (U/ml) R(0) (106 copies/μg RNA) t0 (h) ɛin μ (per day) g (per day)
Eq. 2 100 2.06 (1.81-2.35) 9.5 (5.1-13.8) 0.972 (0.966-0.988) 0.98 (0.88-1.07) NAc
Eq. 4 100 2.06 (1.81-2.35) 9.5 (5.1-13.8) 0.972 (0.966-0.978) 0.027 (0.02-0.04) NA
Eq. 6 100 2.06 (1.81-2.35) 9.5 (3.6-15.4) 0.972 (0.966-0.978) 0.98 (0.85-1.11) 3 × 10−8 (0-0.001)d
Eq. 6 250 2.29 (1.74-3.03) 7.8 (3.1-12.4) 0.927 (0.883-0.970) 2.32 (1.57-3.07) 0.33 (0.217-0.448)
a

Best fits to the frequent sg1b data with 100 and 250 U/ml IFN-α are shown in Fig. 3C. Values in parentheses are 95% CIs. R(0), baseline sg1b RNA concentration; t0, delay until sg1b RNA starts to decline; ɛin, IFN-α effectiveness in blocking sg1b RNA production; μ, sg1b RNA degradation; g, slowing of sg1b RNA production.

b

Eq, equation.

c

NA, not applicable. This parameter does not exist in equations 2 and 4.

d

The lower 95% CI (g = 0) is consistent with a flat second phase.