Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 5;9:26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-9-26

Table 3.

Frequency of explanation required per format for entire sample (n = 106)*.

Frequency of explanation (%) Relationship to performance
Verbal label 48 U = 1346.00, p = .67, r = -0.04

Percentage 6 U = 234.50, p = .28, r = -0.10

Proportion-word 27 U = 1017.50, p = .46, r = -0.07

Proportion-notation 36 U = 1133.00, p = .26, r = -0.11

Pie chart 16 U = 735.50, p = .78, r = -0.03

* With the exception of percentage in which N = 105