Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 26;4(6):e6057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006057

Table 3. Quantitation of copy number aberrations and CNNLOH in samples with varying proportions of normal cells.

Sample Segments with CN loss Segments with CN gain Segments with CNNLOH>0.5
13A, N = 0.26 264 590 900
13A micro, N = 0.11 1349 1502 1226
13A micro/13A 5.0 2.6 1.4
234A, N = 0.20 1568 988 831
234A micro, N = 0.14 1581 953 808
234A micro/234A 1.0 1.0 1.0
296, N = 0.36 16 226 302
296 micro, N = 0.02 1958 887 505
296 micro/296A 122 3.9 1.6
319, N = 0.23 1036 1823 1274
319 micro, N = 0.01 2221 2116 1269
319 micro/319A 2.1 1.2 1.0
367, N = 0.23 2446 1324 873
337 micro, N = 0.01 2649 2026 593
367 micro/367A 1.1 1.5 0.7

The number of genomic segments with predicted copy number gain or loss is indicated for each sample. The number of segments with CNNLOH larger than 0.5 and no copy aberrations detected in either analysis are also shown. The ratio of the number of aberrations in the microdissected and whole samples are indicated. For the samples with large differences in detection of segments with copy number differences, such as 13A, 296A and 319A, the corresponding detection of CNNLOH appears to be more robust. The proportion of normal cells for each sample is obtained either from manual counting (whole samples) or by the method presented here (microdissected samples).