Table 2.
Study | Method of stress induction | Phrase duration | Total number of syllables | Total number of different syllables types | Percentage of copied syllables | Percentage of copied syllables types | Learning accuracy | Song amplitude |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spencer et al. 2003 | Food restriction | Decreased | Reduced | No effect | ||||
Gil et al. 2006 | Brood size manipulation | No effect | No effect | No effect | No effecta | |||
Zann and Cash 2008 | Food restriction | Increased | No effect | No effect | No effectb | |||
Holveck et al. 2008 | Brood size manipulation | No effect | No effect | No effect | No effect | No effect | Decreasedc | |
This study | Food restriction | No effect | No effect | No effect | No effect | No effect | Decreasedb | No effect |
Cells with no entries indicate that the respective trait has not been investigated
aBased on visual comparisons of tutor and tutee songs
bBased on spectral parameter analysis with Sound Analysis Pro software
cBased on spectral parameter analysis with Luscinia software