Skip to main content
. 2007 Sep;37(9):2518–2528. doi: 10.1002/eji.200636892

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Expression of GMRα by macrophages and characterisation of myeloid cells. (A) Inflammatory peritoneal macrophages were elicited by intraperitoneal administration of thioglycollate broth (top panels) or biogel (middle panels) for 4 days. GMRα expression was analysed by FACS along with the macrophages identified by F4/80 and CD11b profiles (gated regions). Alveolar macrophages were isolated from lung lavage and gated in accordance with the expression of F4/80 and CD11c (bottom panels). GM-Fc (right panels, grey lines), when compared to control-Fc (right panels, black lines), bound specifically and at high levels to the macrophage populations. (B) RAW264.7 cells were stimulated with 100 ng/mL poly(I:C), Pam3CSK4, flagellin or LPS or 5×106 particles/well of zymosan. After 24 h, binding of GM-Fc was assessed by FACS. Data represent the results of four independent experiments and error bars are the SD. Data were analysed by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Dunnet's post test; *p<0.05, **p<0.01. (C) We used GM-Fc to identify GMRα-expressing cells in the resting peritoneal cavity (upper panels). Gating on GMRα+ cells identified three populations of myeloid cells, which expressed distinct levels of the myeloid markers CD11b and F4/80 (populations 1–3, upper right panel). The physical FSC/SCC profiles of three populations are shown in the lower panels. Population 1 exhibits the classic F4/80highCD11bhigh phenotype of resident peritoneal macrophages. The second F4/80lowCD11bhigh population also expressed MHC class II and exhibited dendritic cell-like characteristics (Dioszeghy et al., manuscript in preparation) and the third rarer population shared the phenotype of eosinophils.