Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Educ Prev. 2009 Apr;21(2):156–168. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2009.21.2.156

Table 2.

Descriptive Statistics for Study Variables by HIV-Status

Variable HIV− HIV+ Total t/χ2/F
(N = 89) (N = 31) (N = 120)
Sociodemographic Characteristics
Age 32.03(9.83) 37.97(7.58) 33.57(9.63) −3.46***
Education 14.85(3.06) 14.58(2.43) 14.78(2.90) 0.45
Income (in thousands) 30.59(25.03) 20.44(18.67) 27.95(23.89) 2.06*
Employment Statusa 20.84***
     Unemployed b 22 22 44
     Part-Time Work 18 2 20
     Full-Time Work 48 7 55
Race/Ethnicity 7.03
     White 24 11 35
     Latino 22 9 31
     Black 19 9 28
     Asian/Pacific Islander 16 1 17
     Other 8 1 9
Sexual Behavior in the prior two months
URAI occasionsc 8.03(10.59) 14.32(26.94) 9.66(16.54) −1.24
Number of partners with whom
participants had URAIc
4.71(5.97) 5.97(25.30) 5.89(13.14) −3.27**
Had a serodiscorant partner 6.04*
     No 57 12 69
     Yes 32 19 51
Decisional Balance of Bareback Sex
Overall Score 2.85(5.71) 5.10(4.40) 3.42(5.48) 1.97*
Coping with Vulnerabilities
Subscale
−0.37(2.38) 0.82(1.52) −0.07(2.25) 2.55*
Pleasure & Emotional
Connection Subscale
3.22(3.89) 4.37(3.51) 3.51(3.82) 1.46
*

p ≤ .05;

**

p ≤ .01;

***

p ≤ . 001

a

One HIV-negative participant refused to answer.

b

Thirteen participants (11 HIV-positive and 2 HIV-negative) reported being on disability.

c

Variables were transformed using the log-10 distribution to alleviate skewness. Non-transformed coefficients are presented, yet the t-statistics refer to the transformed variable distribution