Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 15;198(2):203–212. doi: 10.1086/589510

Table 2.

Immune responses of viremic EIA-positive and nonviremic EIA-positive injection drug users, as stratified by age and race.

Response Viremic EIA-positive subjects, n/N (%)a Nonviremic EIA-positive subjects n/N (%)a OR (95% CI) Exact P
T cell proliferation
 All subjects 8/21 (38) 13/17 (76) 5.28 (1.06–29.2) .04
 Adjustedb for age and race 4.76 (1.04–27.2) .07
T cell IFN-γ production
 All subjects 3/20c (15) 13/17 (76) 18.4 (2.84–138) .0004
 Adjustedb for age and race 37.4 (4.79–981) .0001
Any T cell responsed
 All subjects 9/20c (45) 16/17 (94) 19.6 (2.04–893) .003
 Adjustedb for age and race 19.9 (2.46–550) .002
nAbs
 All subjects 19/21 (90) 9/16c (56) 0.13 (0.01–0.95) .04
 Adjustedb for age and race 0.07 (0.002–0.60) .01

NOTE. Statistical analyses were performed using StatXact software (version 7; Cytel). CI, confidence interval; IFN, interferon; nAbs, neutralizing antibodies; OR, odds ratio.

a

No. of responders/total no. of subjects (% of subjects who were responders).

b

OR combined over strata was estimated using exact methods with a mid-P–corrected CI. Analysis controlled for sex produced similar results.

c

One subject was not tested.

d

Proliferation or IFN-γ.