Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Infect Dis. 2008 Jul 15;198(2):203–212. doi: 10.1086/589510

Table 3.

Comparison of nonviremic EIA-positive injection drug users with or without in vitro neutralizing antibodies (nAbs).

Characteristic Nonviremic EIA-positive IDUs Pa
With nAbs (n = 9) Without nAbs (n = 7)
Age, median (IQR), years 53 (51.0–54.5) 50 (45.0–51.0) .0115
Duration of IDU, median (IQR), years 32 (31.5–37.0) 30 (24.0–34.0) NS
Frequency of IDU, median (IQR)
 In the past month 1 (0–65) 1 (0–87.5)b NS
 In the past 6 months 355 (54–391)c 150 (12.5–830) NS
No. of sex partners, median (IQR) 1 (0–65) 1 (0–4.5) NS
HCV Abs, median (IQR), ECi score 30.5 (28.5–30.8)c 15 (3.6–29.8) .0093
HCV-specific T cell proliferation
 No. (%) of subjects 8 (89) 4 (57) NS
 Response strength, median (IQR), SI 13.4 (9.5–30.2) 11.8 (5.1–72.2) NS
HCV-specific T cell IFN-γ production
 Subjects with T cell IFN-γ production, no. (%) 6 (67) 6 (86) NS
 Response strength, median (IQR), ELISPOTS/300,000 PBMCs 65 (918.5–130.5) 68 (29.5–111.5) NS

NOTE. Abs, antibodies; ECi, Vitros Immunodiagnostic Anti-HCV Assay (Ortho-Clinical Diagnostics); ELISPOT, enzyme-linked immunospots; HCV, hepatitis C virus; IDU, injection drug use; IFN, interferon; IQR, interquartile range; NS, not significant; PBMCs, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; SI, stimulation index.

a

By Mann-Whitney U test. One subject was not tested for neutralizing antibodies.

b

Data are shown for 6 subjects; 1 subject was not tested.

c

Data are shown for 8 subjects; 1 subject was not tested.