Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 22.
Published in final edited form as: Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Oct 18;108(1):3–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.09.007

Table 4.

Table 4A. Clinical response and survival information within treatment and HER-2 subgroups
FISH analysis of HER-2 IHC analysis of HER-2
Not amplified Amplified 0 or 1+ 2+ or 3+
AP TAP AP TAP AP TAP AP TAP
Number of patients 72 76 9 12 58 72 55 49
Number of deaths 67 61 8 11 52 58 52 41
Median survival (months) 12.0 15.3 22.8 15.1 12.8 15.3 10.8 16.3
Number of responders 26 47 6 6 26 41 15 29
Proportion responding 0.36 0.62 0.67 0.50 0.45 0.57 0.27 0.59
Table 4B. Estimated treatment effects (odds ratio or hazard ratio with 95% confidence interval) of TAP relative to AP within FISH and within IHC subgroups using models with a treatment by HER-2 interaction for each endpoint and adjusted for performance status
FISH analysis of HER-2 IHC analysis of HER-2
Endpoint Not amplified Amplified Pinteraction 0 or 1+ 2+ or 3+ Pinteraction
Survival (HR) 0.62
(0.44, 0.89)
1.27
(0.51, 3.16)
0.16 0.71
(0.49, 1.04)
0.64
(0.42, 0.97)
0.71
Response (OR) 2.75
(1.40, 5.40)
0.43
(0.17, 1.09)
0.06 1.54
(0.76, 3.14)
3.74
(1.63, 8.58)
0.11

HR: death hazard ratio; OR: response odds ratio; Pinteraction: P-value for the test of the treatment by HER-2 interaction term