Skip to main content
. 2009 Apr 23;32(7):1314–1316. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0060

Table 1.

Multivariate logistic regression analyses of the association between smoking status and incident metabolic syndrome

MetS(+) vs. MetS(−) Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
n OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Nonsmokers 202/2,326 1 1 1
New smokers 16/210 0.76 (0.43–1.33) 0.336 0.73 (0.41–1.30) 0.286 0.85 (0.48–1.51) 0.576
Ex-smokers 85/411 2.43 (1.80–3.29) <0.001 2.65 (1.93–3.64) <0.001 1.87 (1.37–2.56) <0.001
Sustained smokers 179/1,113 1.68 (1.33–2.12) <0.001 1.84 (1.44–2.35) <0.001 1.54 (1.21–1.95) 0.001
    Amount of smoking
        <10 cigarettes/day 31/230 1.45 (0.94–2.25) 0.093 1.59 (1.01–2.52) 0.047 1.31 (0.84–2.05) 0.242
        10–19 cigarettes/day 113/726 1.67 (1.27–2.18) <0.001 1.82 (1.37–2.41) <0.001 1.53 (1.15–2.02) 0.003
        ≥20 cigarettes/day 35/157 2.16 (1.39–3.37) <0.001 2.37 (1.48–3.79) <0.001 1.90 (1.21–3.00) 0.006
    Duration of smoking
        <10 years 19/158 1.31 (0.76–2.26) 0.332 1.39 (0.79–2.45) 0.255 1.38 (0.79–2.39) 0.258
        10–19 years 89/565 1.61 (1.20–2.17) <0.001 1.70 (1.25–2.32) 0.001 1.48 (1.09–2.02) 0.012
        >20 years 71/390 1.93 (1.39–2.67) <0.001 2.23 (1.58–3.14) <0.001 1.66 (1.18–2.33) 0.004

The reference category is nonsmokers. Weight change was expressed as a continuous variable in kilograms. Model 1 was adjusted for age, baseline weight, lifestyle status (alcohol and exercise), and the number of components of the metabolic syndrome. Model 2 was adjusted for model 1 and other risk factors including LDL cholesterol, high sensitivity C-reactive protein, uric acid, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance. Model 3 was adjusted for model 1 and weight change. MetS, metabolic syndrome.