Table 4.
Correlations of the A-RHDQoL with SF-36 and W-BQ12 variables
A-RHDQoL | |||
Average Weighted Impact | Overview item QI -present QoL | Overview item QII -impact on QoL | |
WBQ-12 | |||
Positive Well-being | 0.41** | 0.47** | 0.32** |
Energy | 0.43** | 0.36** | 0.37** |
Negative Well-being† | -0.23* | -0.20 | -0.13 |
General Well-being total | 0.40** | 0.48** | 0.34** |
SF-36 | |||
Bodily Pain | 0.23 | 0.17 | 0.08 |
General Health | 0.33** | 0.36** | 0.26** |
Mental Health | 0.30** | 0.41** | 0.20 |
Physical Functioning | 0.31** | 0.32** | 0.17 |
Role-Emotional | 0.25** | 0.39** | 0.06 |
Role-Physical | 0.29** | 0.27** | 0.06 |
Social Functioning | 0.33** | 0.32** | 0.21 |
Vitality | 0.30** | 0.46** | 0.28** |
Significant at **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 (2-tailed) after Bonferroni corrections. Correlations of all SF-36 subscales, W-BQ12 Negative Well-being and General Well-being total were Spearman's rho (non-parametric data), and those of W-BQ12 Positive Well-being and Energy were Pearson's r (parametric data). N: range 112 – 125. †A high score for W-BQ12 subscales indicates more of the subscale mood, (hence the negative correlations between Negative Well-being and A-RHDQoL variables).