Skip to main content
. 2003 Oct 6;1:51. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-51

Table 4.

Correlations of the A-RHDQoL with SF-36 and W-BQ12 variables

A-RHDQoL
Average Weighted Impact Overview item QI -present QoL Overview item QII -impact on QoL
WBQ-12
Positive Well-being 0.41** 0.47** 0.32**
Energy 0.43** 0.36** 0.37**
Negative Well-being -0.23* -0.20 -0.13
General Well-being total 0.40** 0.48** 0.34**
SF-36
Bodily Pain 0.23 0.17 0.08
General Health 0.33** 0.36** 0.26**
Mental Health 0.30** 0.41** 0.20
Physical Functioning 0.31** 0.32** 0.17
Role-Emotional 0.25** 0.39** 0.06
Role-Physical 0.29** 0.27** 0.06
Social Functioning 0.33** 0.32** 0.21
Vitality 0.30** 0.46** 0.28**

Significant at **p < 0.01 and *p < 0.05 (2-tailed) after Bonferroni corrections. Correlations of all SF-36 subscales, W-BQ12 Negative Well-being and General Well-being total were Spearman's rho (non-parametric data), and those of W-BQ12 Positive Well-being and Energy were Pearson's r (parametric data). N: range 112 – 125. A high score for W-BQ12 subscales indicates more of the subscale mood, (hence the negative correlations between Negative Well-being and A-RHDQoL variables).