Table 1.

Fpocket performance

Dataset	Algorithm	Rank 1		Rank 3
		unbound	bound	unbound	bound
Pocket Picker
	Fpocket	69 (67)	83 (85)	94 (92)	92 (92)
	PocketPicker	69	72	85	85
	LIGSITE(CS)	60	69	77	87
	LIGSITE	58	69	75	87
	CAST	58	67	75	83
	PASS	60	63	71	81
	SURFNET	52	54	75	78
	LIGSITE(CSC)	71	79	-	-
Cheng et al.
	Fpocket	-	75 (70)	-	95 (90)
	PocketPicker	-	70	-	80
Astex Diverse set
	Fpocket	-	67 (73)	-	82 (88)
	PocketPicker	-	59	-	67

Comparison of results obtained for fpocket and other approaches. For sake of comparison, scores are reported using the PPc, and we present scores at rank 1 and 3 (true pocket in the top 3 pockets proposed by fpocket). For the Pocket Picker dataset, results are taken from [23] for all but fpocket. For fpocket, numbers within parentheses correspond to scores obtained using the MOc.