Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 9;9:96. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-96

Table 5.

Performance of the algorithm in predicting readmission for Queensland compared to UK and US data

Risk score threshold
50% 70% 80%

Queensland data
Sensitivity (95% CI) 44.7 (42.5–46.9) 7.8 (6.7–9.1) 1.1 (0.1–1.7)
Specificity (95% CI) 78.1 (76.4–79.6) 97.5 (96.8–98.1) 99.8 (99.6–99.9)
False positive rate (95% CI) 37.5 (35.0–40.0) 28.2 (22.3–34.6) 14.8 (4.2–33.7)
LR+ (95% CI) 2.04 (1.86–2.23) 3.11 (2.33–4.15) 7.02 (2.43–20.28)
LR- (95% CI) 0.71 (0.68–0.74) 0.95 (0.93–0.96) 0.99 (0.99–1.00)

UK study[11]
Sensitivity 54.3 17.8 8.1
Specificity 72.2 95.0 98.6
False positive rate 34.7 22.6 15.7
LR+ (95% CI) 2.0 3.6 5.8
LR- (95% CI) 0.6 0.9 0.9

US study[14]
Sensitivity 57.9 Not reported Not reported
Specificity 70.7
False positive rate 34.1
LR+ (95% CI) 2.0
LR- (95% CI) 0.6