Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 23.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):541–553. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.541

Table 1.

Percentage of first responses that were changed on second response. Thus, at low prevalence in Experiment 1a, only 9.2% of targets missed on first response were found on the second, 10.5% in Experiment 1b, and 29.9% in Experiment 2.

Experiment/
Prevalence
Miss to Hit Correct Absent
to False Alarm
Hit to Miss False Alarm to
Correct Absent

Experiment 1a
  Low (2%) 9.2% 0.4% 0.0% 9.7%
  High (50%) 5.9% 0.4% 0.0% 6.8%
Experiment 1b
  Low (2%) 10.5% 0.6% 0.0% 2.8%
High (50%) 8.0% 0.6% 0.4% 2.3%
Experiment 2
  Low (2%) 29.9% 1.7% 0.5% 2.4%
  High (50%) 16.7% 1.9% 0.4% 10.1%