Skip to main content
. 2009 Jan;29(1):81–88. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2008.00838.x

Table 2.

Patient data and results of image quality, diagnostic confidence and radiation dose of spiral and sequential CTA (n = 20).

PT # Gender Protocol: 1 = SPIR, 2 = SEQ BMI HR Prior to acquisition MG Metoprolol Nitrate (Y/N) HR During acquisition Best ECG phase Overall image quality 1–5 (1 = Poor, 5 = Excellent) Artefact type DG Confidence 1–5 (1 = Poor 5 = Excellent) DLP (mGy*cm) Calc.Eff.Dose (MsV)
1 F 1 20·4 63 25 Y 61 80 4 STAIR 5 866 14·7
2 F 1 22·4 80 25 Y 55 80 5 NONE 5 1064 18·1
3 F 1 25·7 65 10 Y 50 75 5 NONE 5 1076 18·3
4 F 1 28·3 64 10 Y 67 80LCA 40RCA 3 MOTION 4 1074 18·3
5 M 1 32·1 58 5 Y 63 80 3 NOISE 4 1369 23·3
6 F 1 43·0 75 20 Y 98 40 1 NOISE 2 1538 26·1
7 F 1 24·5 86 30 Y 77 40 3 MOTION 3 1053 17·9
8 F 1 20·4 59 5 Y 55 75 5 NONE 5 1005 17·1
9 F 1 28·7 64 15 Y 55 75 3 NOISE, STAIR 3 1364 23·2
10 M 1 23·7 78 25 Y 64 70LCA40RCA 4 NOISE 4 961 16·3
Mean ± SD 26·9 ± 6·8 69·2 ± 9·7 17 ± 9·2 64·5 ± 14·1 3·6 ± 1·3 4·0 ± 1·1 1137 ± 213 19·3 ± 3·6
11 M 2 27·6 68 15 N 61 75 4 NOISE 4 470 8·0
12 F 2 20·9 75 25 Y 61 75 4 STAIR 5 437 7·4
13 F 2 32·0 68 20 Y 61 75 3 NOISE 4 371 6·3
14 F 2 39·2 50 0 N 62 75 3 NOISE 4 495 8·4
15 M 2 26·9 50 0 Y 51 80 4 NONE 4 494 8·4
16 M 2 30·1 52 0 Y 52 75 4 STAIR 5 465 7·9
17 M 2 24·8 48 0 Y 44 80 5 NONE 5 491 8·3
18 F 2 24·1 64 15 Y 60 75 5 NONE 5 436 7·4
19 M 2 30·3 74 15 Y 56 75 2 NOISE, MOTION 3 472 8·0
20 M 2 31·1 73 30 Y 58 75 3 NOISE 4 366 6·2
Mean ± SD 28·7 ± 5·1 62·2 ± 11·0 12·0 ± 11·4 56·6 ± 5·9 3·7 ± 0·9 4·3 ± 0·7 450 ± 48 7·6 ± 0·8