Skip to main content
. 2009 May 8;103(9):1529–1545. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp095

Table 2.

A classification of flower–pollinator dynamics based on the interaction of pollinator and flower-part movements, determining over how broad an area pollen is deposited and the expected precision of pollen deposition and stigma contact

Floral class Floral characteristics Pollinator movement during pollination Area of pollen deposition Expected precision (consistency of pollen placement, stigma contact) Example(s)
1 Open, fixed platform Crawls across flower Broad area Low Passiflora spp.
2 Fixed position, broadly tubular or gullet Crawls down tube Broad area Low Penstemon, Mimulus, Linum, Rubiaceae
3 Fixed platform or narrow tube Hovers, landing into fixed position without subsequent movement (‘helicoptering’) Small area High Dalechampia
4 Motile flower parts Nearly immobile at time of contact with sexual parts Small area High Salvia, Collinsia, papilionoid legumes
5 ‘Explosively’ motile flower parts Completely immobile at time of contact with sexual parts Small area Very high Hyptis, Stylidium, Catasetum
6 Secondary pollen presentation, immobile flower parts Mobile or immobile Often small area? Often medium to high? Polygala, Asteraceae, Campanulaceae
7 Secondary pollen presentation, motile flower parts, often ‘explosive’ Nearly or completely immobile at time of contact with sexual parts Small area Very high Calathea