Skip to main content
. 2009 May 8;103(9):1529–1545. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcp095

Table 4.

Inaccuracy statistics for Linum suffruticosum, Dalechampia spp., Collinsia spp. and Stylidium spp.

Species (location; no. of flowers measured) Sexual function Overall floral integration: relativized standardized Wagner–Cheverud Integration Index (%) Overall floral integration: Hansen–Houle Integration Index (%) Male–female integration: Hansen–Houle Integration Index (%)/(95 % CI) Departure from optimum (mm)/% total inaccuracy Imprecision: trait variance/(CV)/% total inaccuracy Variance in optimum/(CV)/% total inaccuracy Raw inaccuracy Mean2-scaled inaccuracy (95 % CI)
Linum suffruticosum (Ronda, Spain; n = 24) Thrum 0·14/7·76 % 0·096/(20·1 %)/38·0 % 0·137/(22·0 %)/54·2 % 0·253 10·65 % (–)
(n = 31) Pin 0·14/7·76 % 0·137/(22·0 %)/54·2 % 0·096/(20·1 %)/38·0 % 0·253 8·95 (–)
Linum suffruticosum (Grazalema, Spain; n = 14) Thrum 0·16/8·06 % 0·176/(25·1 %)/55·5 % 0·116/(18·6 %)/36·4 % 0·318 11·39 (–)
(n = 14) Pin 0·16/8·06 % 0·116/(18·6 %)/36·4 % 0·176/(25·1 %)/55·5 % 0·318 9·48 (–)
Linum suffruticosum (Malaga, Spain; n = 24) Thrum 0·147/15·7 % 0·069/(15·8 %)/49·9 % 0·137/(12·1 %)/34·4 % 0·137 5·03 (2·83–8·03)
(n = 21) Pin 0·147/15·7 % 0·137/(12·1 %)/34·4 % 0·069/(15·8 %)/49·9 % 0·137 4·18 (2·58–6·01)
Dalechampia scandens (Tulum, Mexico; n = 13) Male 19·1 21·7 47·0 (2·0–93·0) 0·48/13·0 % 0·715/(23·0 %)/40·4 % 0·824/(21·8)/46·6 % 1·77 13·07 (6·23–20·5)
(n = 19) Female 0·48/13·0 % 0·824/(21 %)/46·6 % 0·715/(23·0 %)/40·4 % 1·56 9·85 (5·63–13·71)
Dalechampia scandens (Pto Morelos, Mexico; n = 115) Male 28·1 27·0 12·2 (2·0–25·0) 0·39/9·56 % 0·798/(19·7 %)/50·19 % 0·640/(17·3 %)/40·25 % 1·59 7·72 (6·04–9·46)
(n = 120) Female 0·39/9·56 % 0·640/(17·3 %)/40·25 % 0·798/(19·7 %)/50·19 % 1·59 6·54 (5·37–7·82)
Dalechampia scandens (La Mancha, Mexico; n = 127) Male 14·7 22·0 28·0 (8·0–49·0) 1·32/52·52 % 0·589/(22·9 %)/17·76 % 0·99/(21·3 %)/29·72 % 3·32 29·56 (24·0–36·3)
(n = 131) Female 1·32/52·52 % 0·99/(21·3 %)/29·72 % 0·589/(22·9 %)/17·76 % 3·32 15·21 (13·2–17·6)
Dalechampia schottii (Puerto Morelos, Mexico; n = 43) Male 6·42 8·11 21·0 (4·0–42·0) 3·547/79·80 % 0·563/(28·0 %)/3·57 % 2·622/(26·0 %)/16·63 % 15·77 219·5 (166·7–287·7)
(n = 51) Female 3·547/79·80 % 2·622/(26·0 %)/16·63 % 0·563/(28·0 %)/3·57 % 15·77 40·66 (36·3–44·8)
Collinsia sparsiflora (Pop. 5, Lower Lake, CA, USA, n = 111) Male 13·5 22·3 62·1 (–) 0·57/7·58 % 0·34/(13·8 %)/33·1 % 0·61/(16·3 %)/58·3 % 1·28 6·38 (3·75–9·18)
(n = 21) Female 0·57 0·61/(16·3 %) 0·34/(13·8 %) 1·28 4·68 (2·93–6·43)
Collinsia concolor (San Jacinto Mtns, CA, USA, n = 96) Male 16·9 26·4 14·0 (0·0–0·41) 1·59/44·44 % 0·376/(11·2 %)/6·61 % 2·78/(43·1 %)/48·95 % 5·69 19·08 (13·6–24·8)
(n = 19) Female 1·59/44·44 % 2·78/(43·1 %)/48·95 % 0·376/(11·2 %)/6·61 % 5·69 37·99 (22·2–64·5)
Stylidium brunonianum (South Boundary, Stirling Range, WA, Australia, n = 6) Column length (male & female) 29·1 42·1 100·0 (–) 0/0 % 0·154/(6·15 %)/50 % 0·154/(6·14 %)/50 % 0·308 0·757 (0·01–1·08)
(n = 16) Column reach (male) 0/0 % 0·118/(10·82 %)/50 % 0·118/(10·82 %)/50 % 0·236 2·33 (0·17–5·28)
Stylidium bicolor (Yanchep, WA, Australia, n = 10) Column length (male& female) 8·1 10·8 100·0 (–) 0/0 % 0·543/(5·60 %)/50 % 0·543/(5·60 %)/50 % 1·09 0·628 (0·15–0·91)
(n = 9) Column reach (male) 0/0 % 1·16/(16·5 %)/50 % 1·16/(16·5 %)/50 % 2·31 5·46 (0–10·46)
Stylidium hirsutum (South Boundary, Stirling Range, WA, Australia, n = 8) Column length (male & female) 17·3 29·1 100·0 (–) 0/0 % 0·426/(10·1 %)/50 % 0·426/(10·1 %)/50 % 0·852 2·02 (0·90–3·24)
(n = 11) Column reach (male) 0/0 % 0·077/(5·8 %)/50 % 0·077/(5·8 %)/50 % 0·154 0·668 (0·10–0·98)

The standardized integration index is calculated as the percentage maximal integration, corrected for the number of traits (see Methods). Abbreviations: CV = coefficient of variance, CV2 = mean-squared scaled variance, additive to the percentage departure from the optimum to obtain the mean-squared-scaled inaccuracy; CI = confidence interval.