Table 4.
GP appraisers' attitudes towards the feasibility, acceptability, and educational gain of peer-reviewed criterion audit (n = 15).
| Level of agreement, rating scale 1–7a | ||
|---|---|---|
| Attitudinal statement | Median | Number of rating scores ≥4 |
| Feasibility | ||
| Undertaking a completed audit cycle using the method outlined is feasible as part of normal general practice | 6 | 13 |
| Submitting at least one completed audit report for external peer feedback should be feasible for most GPs over a 5-year period | 6 | 14 |
| Acceptability | ||
| I was happy to have my completed audit report reviewed by trained colleagues | 6 | 14 |
| The feedback I received on my completed audit report was fair | 6 | 14 |
| I understood the process by which my completed audit was peer reviewed | 6 | 15 |
| Submitting at least one completed audit report for external peer feedback over a 5-year period would be acceptable to most GPs | 5 | 15 |
| Educational impact | ||
| The feedback helped me understand more about the process of completing an audit project | 5 | 11 |
| The feedback gave me specific advice on how to improve my skills in audit | 5 | 15 |
| I have made (or will make) changes that have improved my ability to conduct audit in the practice | 4 | 12 |
| Assessment of criterion audit by peer feedback is a useful educational tool | 6 | 15 |
| Submitting at least one completed audit report for external peer feedback over a 5-year period would have an educational impact for most GPs | 6 | 13 |
a
1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree.