Table 5.
GP Appraisers' attitudes towards the feasibility, acceptability and educational gain of peer-reviewed video consultations (n = 8).
| Level of agreement, rating scale 1–7a | ||
|---|---|---|
| Attitudinal statement | Median | Number of rating scores ≥4 |
| Feasibility | ||
| Completing a video of six patient consultations is feasible as part of normal general practice | 5 | 5 |
| Submitting at least one video of six patient consultations for external peer feedback should be feasible for most GPs over a 5-year period | 5 | 6 |
| Acceptability | ||
| I was happy to have my video reviewed by trained colleagues | 6 | 7 |
| The feedback I received on my video of consultation skills was fair | 6 | 8 |
| I understood the process by which my video was peer reviewed | 6 | 8 |
| Submitting at least one video for external peer feedback over a 5-year period would be acceptable to most GPs | 4 | 6 |
| Educational impact | ||
| The feedback gave me specific advice on how to improve my consultation skills | 5.5 | 7 |
| I have made (or will make) changes that have improved my ability to consult with patients | 5 | 8 |
| Assessment of video by peer feedback is a useful educational tool | 6 | 8 |
| Submitting at least one video for external peer feedback over a 5-year period would have an educational impact for most GPs | 6 | 8 |
a
1 = strongly disagree to 7 = strongly agree.