Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Apr;109(4):624–632. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.12.013

Table 3. Result of binary logistic regressions of potential correlates of underreporting–Methods 1 through 5.

Method 1 Method 2 Method 3 Method 4 Method 5
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Age
 31-50 years old 0.76 0.40, 1.44 0.78 0.37, 1.65 1.45 0.48, 4.37 1.42 0.63, 3.20 1.09 0.62, 1.93
 51+ years old 1.39 0.58, 3.36 1.23 0.45, 3.36 5.46 1.70, 17.56** 4.09 1.64, 10.21** 2.44 1.16, 5.17*
Body Mass Index Category
 Overweight 1.57 0.86, 2.87 1.76 0.90, 3.46 1.91 0.51, 7.08 2.56 1.00, 6.54* 1.62 0.89, 2.95
 Obese 3.06 1.62, 5.80*** 2.76 1.36, 5.62** 4.96 1.45, 16.97** 3.54 1.42, 8.86** 2.30 1.27, 4.17**
>$2001/month 1.67 1.02, 2.74* 1.38 0.79, 2.42 1.29 0.65, 2.53 1.86 1.08, 3.19* 1.39 0.90, 2.15
≥ High School 1.02 0.64, 1.62 1.15 0.67, 1.97 1.87 0.97, 3.63 1.79 1.06, 3.02* 1.00 0.66, 1.52
Acculturation Level
Anglo orientation score 1.01 0.72, 1.41 0.94 0.64, 1.38 1.09 0.68, 1.73 1.49 1.03, 2.14* 0.81 0.60, 1.10
Mexican orientation score 0.81 0.47, 1.39 1.06 0.58, 1.95 0.85 0.41, 1.74 0.76 0.42, 1.35 1.07 0.67, 1.73
*

P<0.05,

**

P<0.01,

***

P<0.001