Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Jun 26.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 25;36(4):1207–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.031

Table 4.

Results for the one-way ANOVA F test showing that the evaluation measurements among the algorithms are truly different. The whole 40 data sets are used.

One-way ANOVA k − 1 df nk df F p
JC vs. ASRE WM 10 30 27.25 <0.0001
JC vs. ASRE GM 10 30 23.85 <0.0001
JC vs. ASRE CSF 10 30 136.02 <0.0001

Williams JC WM 10 30 23.55 <0.0001
Williams JC GM 10 30 22.76 <0.0001
Williams JC CSF 10 30 51.13 <0.0001