Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun 4;199(5):566.e1–566.11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.04.020

Table 5.

Correlation between microarray and QRT-PCR* expression measurements

Microarray QRT-PCR Spearman Rank Correlation
T-test (p-value)¥ Fold change T-test (p-value) Fold change Controls Cases
LEP 0.00 5.52 0.01 3.82 0.41(0.09) 0.93(0.00)
FLT1 0.00 2.76 0.00 1.88 0.36(0.16) 0.92(0.00)
CYP11A 0.01 2.26 0.13 1.13 0.33(0.18) 0.67(0.00)
F2R 0.00 2.16 0.47 1.38 0.56(0.02) 0.47(0.06)
FCGR2B 0.01 2.16 0.46 1.12 0.83(0.000 0.55(0.02)
CDO1 0.00 2.14 0.02 1.15 0.03(0.92) 0.35(0.17)
PROCR 0.00 1.99 0.02 1.52 0.44(0.07) 0.86(0.00)
TPBG 0.01 1.74 0.00 1.64 0.54(0.02) 0.78(0.00)
NR4A2 0.00 0.50 0.03 0.57 0.52(0.04) 0.67(0.00)
*

QRT-PCR conducted using Clontech gene assays.

¥

Students’ T-test p-values comparing expression measurement among cases and controls.

Spearman rank correlation (p-values) between microarray and QRT-PCR gene expression measurments.