. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.

Published in final edited form as: Schizophr Res. 2009 May 1;112(1-3):136–142. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2009.04.007

Table 2.

Each row shows the mean raw and GEE adjusted PAS scores for all three diagnostic groups. GEE models corrected for differences in age, family SES, and gender, as well as the intercorrelation of PAS scores within families. Adjustments to the raw values were small.

PAS Raw and GEE Adjusted Mean Scores

	Controls					Siblings					Probands

	Adjusted					Adjusted					Adjusted
	n	Raw	Mean¹	SEM	95% CI	n	Raw	Mean¹	SEM	95% CI	n	Raw	Mean¹	SEM	95% CI
PAS childhood	260	.139	.138	.009	.126: .151	314	.175	.175	.007	.162: .190	286	.249	.284	.006	.231: .265
PAS early adolescence	260	.153	.153	.006	.142: .164	314	.188	.188	.006	.176: .201	277	.285	.284	.008	.268: .300
PAS late adolescence	260	.144	.145	.007	.131: .158	314	.187	.188	.007	.173: .202	246	.330	.330	.011	.309: .351
PAS adulthood	259	.113	.112	.005	.102: .123	308	.161	.159	.007	.145: .173	184	.368	.367	.015	.337: .397
PAS general	260	.094	.093	.005	.084: .103	314	.125	.123	.006	.111: .135	284	.340	.341	.005	.324: .358

GEE Estimated Marginal Mean