Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;50(3):250–267. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2009.50.250

Table 3.

Resolution of major components in 100 pg mixtures*

Sample Complete loci Partial loci Database loci Inconclusive loci
1:50a 11 2 13 0
1:50b 11 2 13 0
1:49c 12 0 13 0
1:49d 12 1 13 0
1:49e 11 2 13 0
1:49f 10 3 13 0
1:20a 11 2 13 0
1:20b 11 2 13 0
1:19c 10 3 13 0
1:19d 12 1 13 0
1:19e 11 2 13 0
1:19f 10 3 13 0
1:10a 10 3 13 0
1:10b 10 3 13 0
1:9c 9 4 13 0
1:9d 12 1 13 0
1:9e 11 2 13 0
1:9f 10 3 13 0
1:5a 10 3 13 0
1:5b 8 5 13 0
1:5g 12 1 13 0
1:4c 5 8 7
1:4d 10 1 13 0
1:4e 6 1 9 4
1:4f 5 8 2
1:3a 5 3 5
1:3b 4 7 5
1:3g 8 5 13 0
1:2c 1 0 9
1:2d 3 10 4
1:2e 3 10 4
1:2f 2 10 9

*100 pg mixtures of 6 buccal samples were prepared in ratios of 1:50 to 1:1 as indicated (1:1 mixtures not shown). Designations of “a,” “b,” “c,” “d,” “e,” “f,” and “g” correspond to the combination of samples used to prepare the mixtures. All mixture samples were amplified in triplicate.

†Deduced profiles had fewer than 6 complete loci.